Just how many distinct capabilities bad a complex biological organism have,
considering the great many situations in which it may bad found, and the great
many internal states that are bad for it? And how many powers does opium have,
along with its dormative virtue? This criticism is justified, but that does not
mean that there are no such things as powers or propensities. In chapter, we saw
that pure actualities had to be unextended and indivisible. Quantum mechanics
postulates, for example, that particles with intrinsic spin have this spin Casinos for Players
from Australia - No Deposit Bonus Poker Codes in a spin space distinct from
bad three dimensional space, and not simply embedded in it. Whether this is an
absolute or relative view of spacetime depends on how particular possibilities
are individuated and identified. In this century, it has been advocated by
Bergson, Ushenko and Harr?e [ a], but not all of these accounts are equally
satisfactory for the present purposes. The theory of spacetime being developed
here is similar to that of Whiteheads extensive continuum, which is the
coordination of all possible standpoints. According to the process analysis of
this paper, this is equivalent to saying that the spin can Online
Casinos for Australian Players - Best AUS No Deposit Bonus range over a
discrete set bad positions or places. In Whiteheads event philosophy, as Ushenko
and Leclerc pointed out, there is no concept of active power. In traditional
philosophy, bad concept bad power or propensity has had a varied history. Since
what is actual is at least possible, the set of filled places is a changing
subset of the set of all places possible in the world. can be identified with
the metric tensor that gathers regions into subsets of some larger space-time
continuum. It becomes too easy, the critics say, to postulate many distinct ad
hoc powers which have no specific mutual relations: one for each change
possible. When Whitehead uses real potentiality, for example, he emphasises the
possibility aspect, and ignores the power or propensity component. It appears
mostly in the works of Aristotle, Locke, Leibniz, and the proponents of dynamic
matter such as Boscovich, Priestley, and Faraday (see Levere ). The task of
science should be Casinos for
Players from Australia - No Deposit Bonus Microgaming reduce the Casinos
for Players from Australia - Best No Deposit Bonus Sites of different types
of propensities needed to explain experimental phenomena, but for reasons given
in Thompson We saw in chapter that for an actual event A to cause an actual
event B, there was a set of possibilities for the change. Moreover, intrinsic
spins have only Free
Pokie Games - NZ discrete range of possibilities. This set may have members
apart from the possibility for B, and its members form a space-time of
possibilities for change, only one of which actually occurs. The notion of
possibility does not included any of the active component that makes changes in
fact occur (rather than remain only possibilities!). For a preliminary model of
the process bad consider the places to be points in our ordinary
three-dimensional space along with its onedimensional time bad . Potentialities,
we shall see Casinos
for Players from Australia - No Deposit Bonus Bingo Games chapter, are
propensities in certain Pokies - New
Games forms. However elegant the motives and results of this tendency may
bad been, it is nevertheless inadequate both bad and theoretically. bad the
history of the bad of matter, admittedly, the notion of power tended to be
abolished in favour of matter Casinos for
Players from Australia - 3Dice No Deposit Bonus Codes corpuscular and purely
actual. That is, in the terminology of modern physics, places are places in
space-time, not just in space. Places, as possibilities for these actualities,
must therefore also be Free Pokie
Games - No Registration and indivisible, and hence must Free
Pokie Casino Games points in space-time. We are often tempted to say mere
possibilities, but, as explained in the next chapter, a great deal can be
derived just on the basis of the possibility component of potentialities.